which begs the question of strategy engage, feed them no useful information, try to gain information ourselves radio silence or engage and hope for rescue, secondary or not
[ anderson errs on the side of caution usually, and both the first and the third option come at great risk
then again: is it better to maintain the status quo? ( she knows what erik would say. ) ]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
text.
I was trying something
∞
[ information, of course, but to what purpose? so far, it's only been lina making contact, but she's clearly not working alone.
anderson's not sure what to make of all of this. vigilance might indeed be wise. ]
i didn't know you like soap operas, nathan
no subject
and they're using us to determine its location through deceit and now promise of rescue
at best, a rescue is a secondary priority
at worst, it's a lie to win our compliance
so goes my belief
no subject
which begs the question of strategy
engage, feed them no useful information, try to gain information ourselves
radio silence
or engage and hope for rescue, secondary or not
[ anderson errs on the side of caution usually, and both the first and the third option come at great risk
then again: is it better to maintain the status quo? ( she knows what erik would say. ) ]
no subject
but I think we can use the first one to buy some time
and if it's all a big misunderstanding we can laugh about it over tea
no subject
with everyone
[ unless comms can control the network and censor everyone's interactions, but, well. that might be going a little too far. ]
no subject
lofty goals
but yes, it might spare us from people being overly helpful
some more
no subject
no subject
let me know how you get on
no subject
i assume you'll want to be there
no subject
no subject